Voiceflow Alternatives in 2026: 7 Options, Most With Public Pricing

Voiceflow is a capable platform for designing chat and voice agents, with a collaborative canvas and a large developer surface. The most common reason teams look elsewhere in 2026 is pricing visibility: Voiceflow's pricing page no longer lists prices.

On 3 November 2026 the page offered two paths. Agencies and partners get a free trial with no credit card, usage-based billing, multi-client workspaces, white-labeling and access to major model providers. Businesses request pricing after a demo, with implementation support, voice and chat deployment, observability and roles. That works for teams ready for a sales process. It does not work for a team that needs a number in a budget this week.

The other reasons are fit: some teams want a chat-only agent live without designing on a canvas, some want published per-conversation pricing, and some want self-hosting. The alternatives below cover each case.

Entry prices as published on 3 November 2026.

1. Botpress

Botpress is the closest like-for-like alternative: a builder platform with a visual Studio, an integrations hub, an agent development kit and published prices.

Pricing (3 November 2026 unless noted): Free with 100 conversations a month, 3 agents and 3 seats; Plus $150 a month billed yearly with 250 conversations and $25 AI spend; Team $750 with 1,500 conversations and $150 AI spend. Packs of 100 extra conversations at $65 (Plus) or $50 (Team), added automatically at 95%.

Where it is strong:

• Published prices you can budget
• Large first-party integration hub
• Code-defined agents through the ADK

Where it falls short:

• Chat-first; ask about voice
• Conversation packs auto-recharge and cannot be turned off
• A builder platform, not a quick setup

Best for: Technical teams moving a chat agent. See Botpress vs Voiceflow.

2. Chatbase

Chatbase trains an AI agent on your website and files and adds actions, a help-desk inbox and integrations.

Pricing (3 November 2026 unless noted): Hobby $40 a month ($32 yearly) with 700 message credits; Basic $150 ($120) with 4,000; Business $500 ($400) with 15,000. 40 MB of training content on every plan; branding removal $99 a month.

Where it is strong:

• Fast to a working support agent
• Help-desk integrations from Basic (Zendesk, Intercom, HubSpot)
• Voice and telephony listed from Basic

Where it falls short:

• Not a flow designer like Voiceflow
• Credits metered
• Branding removal costs extra

Best for: Support teams that want an AI agent answering from docs. See Chatbase vs SiteGPT.

3. SiteGPT

SiteGPT is a website-trained AI chatbot with page-based training limits.

Pricing (3 November 2026 unless noted): Starter $59 a month ($39 yearly) with 4,000 GPT-4.1-mini messages and 1,000 pages; Growth $129 ($79) with 10,000 messages; Scale $429 ($259) with 40,000. WhatsApp and branding removal are add-ons.

Where it is strong:

• Trains on large sites
• Low entry price on annual billing
• Zendesk AI agent on Scale

Where it falls short:

• No integrations on Starter
• Add-ons for WhatsApp and branding
• Not a voice or design tool

Best for: Content-heavy sites that need answers, not designed flows.

4. Landbot

Landbot is a hosted visual builder for lead capture and qualification, with AI chats and human takeover.

Pricing (3 November 2026 unless noted): Free with 100 chats; Starter €40 (€32 yearly) with 500 chats and 100 AI chats; Professional €100 (€80) with 2,500 chats and 300 AI chats; WhatsApp from +€100.

Where it is strong:

• Approachable visual builder
• Human takeover on all plans

Where it falls short:

• Per-chat pricing at volume
• Not built for voice

Best for: Marketing teams. See Landbot alternatives.

5. Typebot

Typebot is a developer-friendly conversational builder with public source code and a self-hosting option.

Pricing (3 November 2026 unless noted): Free with 200 chats; Starter $39 a month with 2,000 chats; Pro $89 with 10,000 chats, WhatsApp and custom domains. Monthly billing only. License: FSL 1.1 with Apache 2.0 future license.

Where it is strong:

• Very cheap at volume
• Custom JavaScript, CSS and webhooks
• Self-hostable

Where it falls short:

• No packaged AI agent
• Auto-upgrades at 100% of chats

Best for: Developers who want control and low cost. See Landbot vs Typebot.

6. Tidio

Tidio is live chat with the Lyro AI agent and Flows automation, strong for small stores.

Pricing (3 November 2026 unless noted): Free with 50 billable conversations; Starter $24.17 a month; Growth from $49.17; Plus from $300 plus usage. Lyro from $32.50 a month for 50 AI conversations.

Where it is strong:

• Polished live chat
• Shopify depth

Where it falls short:

• Several meters
• Not a design platform

Best for: Small ecommerce teams. See Tidio alternatives.

7. Conferbot

Conferbot is our product, so treat this entry with the scepticism a vendor listing deserves. It is a no-code chatbot builder that runs one bot across a website widget, WhatsApp, Messenger, Telegram, Discord, Slack and Microsoft Teams, with AI answers trained on your content through the AI knowledge base and hand-off to a person in live chat.

Pricing (3 November 2026 unless noted): Free with 600 conversations a month and 2 chatbots; Starter $19, Pro $39 and Business $59 a month for 2,000, 5,000 and 10,000 conversations (pricing). Every channel is on every plan. Webhooks and the API need Starter; native integrations such as HubSpot, Google Sheets and Stripe need Pro.

Where it is strong:

• Per-conversation pricing, no per-contact or per-channel fees
• Structured flows and AI answers in the same bot
• Live chat hand-off and a shared inbox on every plan, including Free
• 21 AI providers to choose from (see AI models)
• Published per-conversation pricing with no sales call

Where it falls short:

• Not a voice platform
• No agent development kit for code-defined agents
• Instagram is still coming soon

Best for: Teams that want an AI agent on their website and messaging apps without design or engineering time. See AI chatbot builder.

Voice is Voiceflow's clearest strength, and it narrows the list. Of the alternatives above, Chatbase lists voice and telephony from its Basic plan; Botpress is chat-first, so ask it directly how it handles a phone channel. The others are chat products. If phone agents are central, keep Voiceflow on the shortlist and ask for a written quote, or evaluate dedicated voice-agent vendors alongside it.

There is no import from Voiceflow into any of these tools. Moving means re-creating the agent's instructions and knowledge sources, rebuilding any designed flows, re-connecting channels and integrations, and re-testing. Export your knowledge base content and transcripts first. Teams that move from a designed agent to a knowledge-trained one often find the new agent needs fewer flows: much of what was designed by hand becomes answers from content, with a few structured flows for bookings or forms. Our migration guide has a checklist, and RAG vs fine-tuning explains why content-trained agents work.

A rough like-for-like at 1,000 conversations or answers a month, list prices on 3 November 2026, yearly billing where offered. Treat these as orders of magnitude; each vendor counts usage differently.

Get Voiceflow's written quote at the same volume and put it in the same table.

• Voice agents are central and work well for you today.
• Designers and developers collaborate on the canvas, and that workflow is valuable.
• You are an agency and the multi-client workspaces and white-labeling save you time.
• Your quote is competitive for your volume.

• Show the bill for a customer at our volume, including model costs.
• Can we cap spend, or does usage auto-recharge?
• How do designers and developers collaborate on a change?
• How do we test an agent before release, and roll back a bad version?
• Which channels and integrations we need are first-party?

Our vendor evaluation questions has a longer list.

Most of the price differences between these tools come from what they count, not from the headline number. Knowing which model you are buying tells you how the bill will move when your business changes.

Two more lines appear on many invoices: AI as a separate meter (Lyro, Fin outcomes, AI credits, AI spend) and channel add-ons (WhatsApp per number, branding removal). Add both before comparing. A tool that looks cheap on the pricing page can cost more than one that looks expensive once these are in.

For WhatsApp in particular, Meta's own per-message fees sit underneath every model. They depend on category and country, not on the vendor you choose, except where a vendor adds a markup.

Feature lists do not tell you which tool will work for your customers. A short, structured test does. This takes about a week of light effort:

1. Write down your 30 most common customer questions from last month, plus 5 the bot should refuse or hand over.
2. Set up a free plan or trial on two or three shortlisted tools with the same content and the same channel.
3. Run the 35 questions through each and score them: correct, partly correct, wrong, handed over.
4. Change one fact in your content (a price or an opening hour) and see how long each tool takes to pick it up.
5. Trigger a hand-off to a person and check what the agent sees: the transcript, the customer's details, the AI's answer.
6. Estimate the monthly bill from the trial's usage counter, not from the pricing page.

Pick the tool that answers best on your own questions and whose bill you can predict. If two tie, pick the one your team found easier to change, because you will change it every week.

If AI answers are part of the test, our guides to training on a knowledge base and human hand-off explain what good looks like.

Prices, allowances and plan features were read from each vendor's public pricing page on 3 November 2026, unless a different date is shown next to a figure. Where a page contradicted itself, we say so instead of picking a number. We did not run every tool in production for this article; it compares what vendors publish, plus how each pricing model behaves at realistic volumes. Prices change often, so confirm on the vendor's page before you buy. Corrections are welcome via contact. Disclosure: Conferbot is our product; its entry says so.

If the reason you are leaving Voiceflow is that you need a working AI agent on your website and messaging apps with a price you can see today, Conferbot's free plan is a quick way to test that. Background reading: what an AI agent is and choosing an LLM.

Start free with Conferbot - the free plan includes 600 conversations a month and needs no credit card, so you can have the same flow running on a second channel this afternoon.

Whichever tool you pick, run it against a real week of your own conversations before you commit. Pricing pages describe the model; only your traffic tells you the bill. The chatbot cost calculator and the vendor evaluation questions help structure that test.